Craig Woolheater, Cryptomundo wrote:
As posted on the BFRO website last month:
Let it be known far and wide: The market value for bigfoot footage is $100 per second. Shout it from the mountain tops. It’s a fact!
The BFRO is willing to pay at least $100 per second for new and authentic footage of a bigfoot (i.e. clear footage in daylight or in headlights).
If $100-per-second seems like too much to pay for bigfoot footage … consider that most sightings last only a few seconds. And consider that very few people have observed a bigfoot in daylight, and at close range (less than 100 feet), for more than 30 minutes or so.
Observations lasting more than a minute or two are exceedingly rare. That will not change.
The supply of new, authentic bigfoot footage will never exceed the demand.
If you obtain clear bigfoot video footage during a BFRO expedition, the market value will be at least $200 per second. That’s what we would pay for it.
Here’s why:
Reliable measurements of the surroundings, and systematic comparative video clips can be obtained immediately afterward, with the help of several knowledgeable people and witness bystanders.
Comparative clips can be made using the same camera, from exactly the same camera angle. Also, the surrounding foliage in the comparative video is exactly the same as in the original video. The changing foliage pattern is usually the most difficult variable to contend with long after the fact.
A group of experienced bigfoot researchers being present and voluntarily gathering all the useful data immediately afterward … makes things much, much easier for us when trying to ascertain accurate biometric measurements of the figure.
100 Bucks Per Second For Bigfoot Footage?
Forum rules
This forum will sometimes contain copyrighted information, however, it is placed here under Title 17
Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
This forum will sometimes contain copyrighted information, however, it is placed here under Title 17
Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
-
- Chat Center
-
- You do not have permission to post in chat.
@
admin « Tue 1:35 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:56 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:55 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:54 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:53 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:53 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:52 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:51 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:50 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:50 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:49 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:46 am »
@
BrianDriver « Sat 12:59 pm »
@
admin « Thu 9:09 pm »