Matthew Johnson: Threats and Blackmail

I managed to wake up to a shit storm today and Matthew Johnson is the sole cause of the latest drama. The implications of Matt's actions could be far reaching for the pseudo-researcher.

I really am beside myself because of the latest bullying tactics by Johnson. Matthew Johnson claims that "someone" has filed a false complaint against his license to practice. I assume it would be for the state of Washington because that's where Johnson resides. I am not 100% sure.

Regardless of where this allegedly occurred, Johnson blabbed, cried and sniveled about this all over his fan page. Some time ago, Johnson said he knows who filed the report but he failed to provide even a hint of evidence to support his claim. This seems to be typical for Matt. Wild claims and nothing to back it up.

IF anyone filed a complaint against Johnson, we have no idea what it might be for. Any alleged complaint could have merit but that is not for us to decide. It is up to the board that oversees these matters. It is why we have checks and balances in place.


Time went on and not much has been said until today. Johnson unleashed a post on his fan page basically blackmailing  "someone" in to giving up information on who filed a complaint against him and in exchange, Johnson would not file charges against the person. That right there is a huge bag of what-the-fuck-did-you-just-say?. The audacity to do that in public is something else folks. Who the fuck does Matthew Johnson think he is?

Here are the screen shots for all to see. For obvious reasons, I have blurred out the home.

What we have here is a crazed man who will do anything in order to shut people up. Matthew claims to be open and transparent with regards to his "research" but as soon as any slightly hard questions are asked, the person is booted from his high five cult of kool-aid drinkers.

Seriously, check THAT out! How dare anyone question the man behind the curtain! Heretic! Infidel!
There is no end to the arrogance of Matt Johnson. Many normal everyday people have been kicked out of his group. Now Matt has his good little soldiers who bully other members in to being silent. Smile and nod, that's the order of the day.

Well, not any fucking more. I have about had it with this lunatic. Who the fuck does Matthew Johnson think he is? He acts like he has discovered Bigfoot but he doesn't show anything to support his fucking claims?

How do we even know if this smoke and mirrors show is real. Richard Allen mentioned it and so will I. It appears to me as if Johnson is stealing plays from the Rick Dyer Playbook of underhanded moves. Dyer wrote the book, there is no denying it and I see Matt ripping pages out of that book.
Is this just some random house with random people living there, or is there any truth to the claims put forth by Johnson?

If the answer is the latter, Johnson has opened up his ass to a world of hurt from the person who lives in that home. My suggestion to the person or people is that they file another complaint with the board and take every single screen shot here and use it as evidence against Johnson.

Johnson and his sycophants are quite the hypocrites. They bleat on endlessly about haters who dare ask questions about extraordinary claims. They blame entire groups for their own problems and they label those groups as being some sort of witch burning mobs just because curious people want answers for outlandish claims.

Now  just take a look what they have done. I say "THEY" because Matt's fans condone the behavior of their delusional leader. Just read the comments. If they had trees and ropes, there would be lynchings happening. What a sad bunch of fucked up people. Really folks. Take a moment to let it all sink in. What we have here is seriously fucked up shit.

As I was about to close off my post, I received another screen shot. It looks like Matt Johnson is doing a bit of back pedaling.

What kind of bullshit is this? Matt makes no sense with his ramblings. If the board doesn't care about his hobbies. WHY in the fuck is the blowhard making such a big deal out of this? The board doesn't regulate his hobbies so the case should be a non-starter, right?
What's with the chest thumping then? Once again, Johnson rips a page out of the Dyer playbook. Johnson is creating a fictitious boogeyman so his fans can rally against something and thus it gives them a sense of community, a sense of being righteous. It also is a great tool for deflecting any nasty issues that may arise, such as bogus claims of habituating bigfoot.

Johnson can't sue anyone because he hasn't lost any money due any alleged false complaint. Even it it was true, Johnson would have to prove intent and that would be virtually impossible.

Matt Johnson is a bully. He is a blowhard and he cries like a little baby. This latest move is his worst so far. I am repulsed by him and his hypocritical fans. They would rather go down with a burning ship than admit that they could be wrong and that's sad.

In closing, I would just like to say that I always gave Dyers fans ONE chance if they ever wanted to switch sides as it were. If any of Matt's fans wish to talk to me, I am extending the same branch. It's warm and sunny on this side. The side of reality.

Questioning the M.K. Narrative: Bluff Creek Bigfoot

M.K. Davis has created quite a stir with his latest video and his claim that he unknowingly recorded a Bigfoot at Bluff Creek. M.K. has gone so far as to post two enhanced videos of the subject and one video explaining how he came to record the video in question.

 Anyone who knows me, knows that I question all evidence and I never take any evidence at face value. It's in my nature to break it down in every aspect. If there is a crumb trail, I will follow it. Well, I found a few crumbs.

  I can tend to be long winded and this might be one of those times because I think it's important to be thorough.

For those who have not seen the alleged Bigfoot video, here it is, as posted by M.K. Davis. All copyrights belong to the copyright holder. Videos and screen shots are used for educational purposes, commentary and criticism purposes only.

I won't post the enhanced videos but I would like you to watch this video where M.K. Davis explains the events that led up to his alleged Bigfoot video.

M.K. drags this video out a bit by covering two months worth of trips to Bluff Creek. He is including a lot of other information in order to give his Bigfoot video some legitimacy, in my opinion. He seems to be going through an awful lot of effort to show what he thinks is Bigfoot activity. The fact is, there is no evidence of that. Broken trees happen for a variety of reasons.

When I go to the woods I come across broken trees all the time. I even come up to groups of broken trees and here is a shot I took a few months ago to prove it.

There are about five or six trees in the foreground that are all broken at about the same height. So what you might say. Exactly, says I. I think M.K. is just trying too hard to convince us that was a Bigfoot.

In the above narrated video (this seems to be a new theme) explaining what happened, Mr. Davis goes on to say they found a lair but in the original video, there is no mention of any such thing. There is a lengthy shot of water trickling from a hillside and then the video cuts away to show Don talking about a deer skull. Likewise, there was no mention of any prints in the original video.

Have a look for yourself. I believe this video was recorded in October of 2008. It's what M.K. says at one point in the video.

This video turned out to be a gem. When I was watching the narrated video and it got to the part with the culverts, I knew I had seen it before. I went to M.K.'s channel and dug until I found the exact video I had seen a couple of years earlier. I used to be quite the M.K. Davis fan but not so much now, sad to say.

I watched the video hoping to find anything in it that would be helpful to this new claim of a recorded yet unseen-by-his-own-eyes Bigfoot. I have recorded hundreds of hours of videos and not once did something this close go unnoticed by me. The human eye is wonderful for detecting movements and shifts in colours, among other fantastic things.  I simply can not buy the notion that M.K. was standing in a creek, recording in front of himself and he didn't notice this being to his right.
M.K. is in a shaded area with no sunlight in his eyes. I find the odds of him not seeing the thing to be astronomically beyond belief.

Davis then goes on to say that he walked by the beast and never saw it. He surmises that the critter pulled a branch down in order to conceal itself from the human. I am to believe that M.K. sloshed down the creek and this massive beast just sat there and didn't move. Perhaps it lost its fight or flight instincts, who knows for sure. All I can say is that I have never seen a large forest animal just stand there when a human gets that close to it. The animal will charge or it will flee but that's my experiences.

Another thing I would like to know is why M.K. cut his video in half. It kind of ruins the context of the situation. The ten or fifteen second video is actually closer to thirty seconds. Don't believe me?
See for yourself.

Once again, am I supposed to believe that M.K. was within yards of a Bigfoot that was apparently washing up with a cloth and this creature was completely unaware of M.K's presence for thirty seconds or longer? Am I supposed to believe that Mr. Davis didn't see the creature either?

What is easier for me to believe is that M.K. recorded his friend at the edge of the creek washing his hands and getting ready to head back to the truck. It also seems to be the most likely explanation.
Seven years is a long time to try to recall events that happened, especially when one doesn't know that they experienced an event in the first place.

Lastly, why didn't M.K. answer two people on his channel that asked who the figure was? There were only four comments below the video so it's not like he couldn't see it. Does M.K. not read his comments? I know I read all of the comments I receive. I may not answer all of them but I do read them. You Tube notifies the channel owner via email and/or Google+.

If you would like to check for yourself, here is a link to the video and the comments: Bluff Creek 2008


I admit that I am not the best at enhancing videos but I made only one adjustment to the video in hopes of exposing any details not seen in the original.

 Full video at normal speed:

First half of the video slowed down and zoomed:

I see what appears to be a human in a reddish coloured shirt who could possibly be wearing a backpack. The resolution is poor but I very much doubt that this is a Bigfoot.


Why dredge up a thirty second video from seven years ago when the originally posted two year old video only had 1,945 views?


Oh.....um.....never mind.

Question everything.