Matthew Johnson Circles the Wagons

Just when I thought the issue with Bob Gimlin's foreword for Matthew Johnson's book of make believe was settled, it came back. Now I think it's over. I think.

Russell Acord had another sit down video with Bob Gimlin to clear the air. I am not sure WHY it needed clearing again but apparently it did. I am guessing some panties got twisted at the Kool-Aid Klub.

Personally, I was very disappointed with the video. It seemed like Russell and Bob were putting on the brakes and backing up the bus. I had a really good rant over this video with my friend Richard and after I got it out of my system and had a good rest, I gave this some more thought. The things Richard said to me made sense. In between my rant, I was actually paying attention. My man Richard was right.

As much as I was disappointed as to how Bob Gimlin handled this situation, it is his to handle as he sees fit. If he wants to exude tact and diplomacy instead of brutal honesty, that is his prerogative. I don't know the man and I don't know how he handles things. It is what it is and I can live with it.

If you missed the second video Russell and Bob did, here it is.

I assume the Johnson clan watched this video because they seem to be under the delusion that they have somehow been vindicated. It comes as no surprise to me. I have been reading the posts in his group. Most of the people were outraged after the first video, yet most of them never even watched it. They went solely off of what Matthew Johnson said and /or they listened to what that twatwaffle Kevin Beegle had to say. I don't recall that slimeball being part of the narrative before last week.

Patrick Epistemon got the heave-ho from the Kool-Aid Klub for whatever reason. Before his seat got cold, there was Kevin Beegle throwing around assumptions like it was candy. All he has done is further obfuscate the issue. This is what happens when a Gladys Kravitz gets involved.

Anyway. The only thing different between the first and second video is that the second video contained softer language in the way of Bob really not wanting to make enemies. He wasn't bad mouthing Matt Johnson in the first video, which was obvious but the big dummy took offense where there should have been none.

In the first video Bob Gimlin said he did NOT write the foreword for the Johnson's book BUT he did okay the final draft for print. Bob also said he had not read Johnson's book. If he had, perhaps things would have turned out differently. Mr. Gimlin also said he does NOT believe in a paranormal/supernatural Bigfoot or portals, orbs or any of the "woo" stuff.
It's all there in the first video, so watch it if you want to make up your mind about this. Don't take my word for it.

Along comes the second video to reiterate what was said in the first video and included was some pleasantries about not saying anything negative about the crazy man Johnson (my words, not Bob's).

Then for some absolute dumbass reason, the kult klowns start rejoicing.

 First of all, Matthew Johnson has a severe comprehension problem. Bob never said that Johnson changed any of his words. He said he NEVER wrote the foreword. Kevin Jones wrote it for him and he agreed on the final draft BEFORE he read Matt's book. While the second video may come across as a "walking back" or a retraction, it was nothing of the sort. This is classic Matthew Johnson changing what was actually said and interjecting his own words. Understand?

To further confuse the issue, there is Kevin the parrot on Matt's shoulder spin-doctoring things that were not said by Bob.

Once again, Docor Demento can't seem to grasp what was ACTUALLY said by Bob Gimlin. Bob said he approved what Kevin Jones wrote and that it was before he read Matt's book. Why is Johnson trying to confuse the issue in his group?

I have no clue what Kevin is talking about. If Bob wrote something for Ron Morehead's book, did Bob write it or did Kevin Jones? Who the fuck is Mart and what the fuck does any of it have to do with a foreword that Kevin Jones wrote for Bob Gimlin?

I am happy that Matt Johnson found such an incompetent mangler such as Kevin Beegle. It doesn't help Johnson's cause at all. At least Patrick could spell, formulate sentences and make sense, for the most part. Johnson definitely traded down.

This Scott fellow seems to be keeping up, why can't Matt? In the first video, Bob clearly said he he does not believe in any of the woo stuff. Why would he? He was there when Roger Patterson filmed "Patty" in 1967.

There was no pressure from any of the "old schoolers". Johnson uses that term in a derogatory fashion so his followers will fall back in line. Make no mistake, Matthew Johnson is a controlling, lying abuser. He will say anything in order to protect his narrative. He fucked up a few times in his four part conference videos but that will be for other blog posts.

I have been hearing stories that Johnson changed the wording of other contributions in his fantasy book of fictional tales. If any of the Johnson contributors want to be brave enough to step forward and tell their story, please contact me. You must be willing to use your real name. Anonymous sources simply won't cut it.

I am of the thinking that many of Johnson's followers suffer from Stockholm Syndrome or something very similar. It is may seem impossible to break free but it is really very easy. Just remember, Matthew Johnson has no control over you and he can not harm you. It is time for Johnson to be exposed for the disgusting dirtbag he is. Contact me.

 Please watch both videos, compare what was said, then come to YOUR own conclusion. Don't let others tell you what to believe.

Who is Thinker Thunker?

This is a blog post I have been wanting to do for awhile because I am growing weary of hoax enablers, sensationalists, and fabricators of information.

In my opinion, Thinker Thunker has turned in to one of those individuals. I used to be a fan of his videos because I thought he was providing some good breakdowns for questionable videos.
  It seemed like his motives changed over night. Instead of well thought out breakdowns and good observations, his videos have turned in to "everything is a Bigfoot" kind of mentality. I was noticing that Thinker Thunker was revisiting Bigfoot videos that had already been deemed hoaxes by the majority of people in Bigfootland.

I will provide some examples for you.

First up is a screenshot from the IMAX video which allegedly shows a Bigfoot. If I am not mistaken, the subject shown in the video was later reported to be a crew member on an ATV or BMX bike.

In his description, Thinker Thunker goes for the sensational approach and explains why this can NOT be a human.

Then we have the 'Big Red' videos recorded by Timbergiant. In Jim's video, he records something but it's difficult to determine what it is. Some people say it's a dog and others say it's a costume. I am going with the latter on this because I think Timbergiant presents questionable videos. He is either a hoaxer or the luckiest Bigfoot researcher of all time. The man has videos of at least three Bigfoot, multiple videos of foot prints and he has collected evidence, only to be "accidentally" destroyed by TGBF himself.
  According to Thinker, not only is this a Bigfoot, but it's carrying a baby. You can't get more sensational than that.

Next there is the Bigfoot in the giant Sequoias. This video has been proven to be a documentary done by Shawn Bannon, yet Think Thunker still tries to get some mileage out of it by claiming this is a real Bigfoot.

This might be intriguing to someone who is new to the Bigfoot community so I'm sure Thinker Thunker is playing on this for channel hits. Thinker spends a lot of time on his videos but he can't research this to find out it's actually not a Bigfoot? His actions are irresponsible and he is blatantly misrepresenting this particular piece of footage.

There is also the Siberian Bigfoot which was later confirmed to be a hoax by Igor Burstev. Thinker Thunker presented this creature as real and carrying a baby as well.

This screen shot contradicts Thinker Thunker.

The last straw for me was recently. Thinker Thunker took an innocent video of Buffalo and hiker/skiers and turned it in to a Bigfoot video.

 Thinker has presented complete and utter bullshit with this latest "breakdown". His methods are flawed. Sure, he has a cool voice and fancy software but shit is shit. Spritzing it with perfume won't change it.

If you want a much better and realistic breakdown, I suggest you visit Snow Walker's channel or ParaBreakdown's channel. Both men give a more realistic and sane explanation of what occurred in this video.

Breakdown by Snow Walker

ParaBreakdown video

With so much big shittery going on with Thinker Thunker, I decided to have a look around to see if I could find a reason for his motivations of presenting such  sensationalistic crap.

It didn't take long before I believed I had my answers.

"So far I have over 1,300,000 views on Youtube with well over 9,000 subscribers. I'm not exactly a household name, but it's a nice start.

(I use CGI software to examine and investigate paranormal videos.) People LOVE this stuff! :) And it all ties in with my last script (a paranormal thriller,) which happens to be the 1st script I want to shoot. And at least now, I have an active, hungry audience waiting for new projects)"

I have no issues with Mr. White being an entertainer or making money from entertaining. What I have an issue with, is Thinker Thunker making money off his videos by misleading people. He is knowingly creating false information in order to drive traffic to his channel and videos.
   
In my opinion he is no different than any other hoaxer, snake oil salesman or bullshit artist. He should no longer be allowed to ride on the backs of people who are interested in the subject of Bigfoot. He does the community a disservice and it's a slap in the face of those who take this subject seriously.

The man should not be taken seriously when it comes to his breakdown videos of anything related to the subject of Bigfoot.

Tim Fasano Invited To Vegas

Well, Mr. Fasano has been invited to Las Vegas by Rick Dyer. Tim explains nothing in the video below but, he does plug his new membership drive. Let's hope this one stays up past the 24 hour mark.

This is what Tim had to say in the description:

The above has been confirmed by Lynk Paul, on Freezer Boy's blog. Mr. Lynk can be a condescending ass most of the time, and this time is no different.
Lynk points out the fact Tim Fasano spelled Derek's name wrong. Gee, that's a nice thing to do to a person who has been invited by the cult....I mean group Lynk is in.

I hate to break this to Lynk Paul but, it's spelled Derek Randles. If a person is going to mention the name of one of the most respected Bigfoot researchers in the community, please have the courtesy to spell his name correctly.

So, Tim has been invited to Las Vegas for the big hoax...I mean Hank reveal. Will Tim get a chance to witness this shin-dig, or will he be left standing in the airport lobby?

 It's a well known fact Tim and Dyer don't get along but for some strange reason, these two people still interact with each other. It's an odd relationship to say the least.
  IF Tim Fasano really gets to record the event and post the unedited video, what will be shown, if anything?