Matthew Johnson Circles the Wagons

Just when I thought the issue with Bob Gimlin's foreword for Matthew Johnson's book of make believe was settled, it came back. Now I think it's over. I think.

Russell Acord had another sit down video with Bob Gimlin to clear the air. I am not sure WHY it needed clearing again but apparently it did. I am guessing some panties got twisted at the Kool-Aid Klub.

Personally, I was very disappointed with the video. It seemed like Russell and Bob were putting on the brakes and backing up the bus. I had a really good rant over this video with my friend Richard and after I got it out of my system and had a good rest, I gave this some more thought. The things Richard said to me made sense. In between my rant, I was actually paying attention. My man Richard was right.

As much as I was disappointed as to how Bob Gimlin handled this situation, it is his to handle as he sees fit. If he wants to exude tact and diplomacy instead of brutal honesty, that is his prerogative. I don't know the man and I don't know how he handles things. It is what it is and I can live with it.

If you missed the second video Russell and Bob did, here it is.

I assume the Johnson clan watched this video because they seem to be under the delusion that they have somehow been vindicated. It comes as no surprise to me. I have been reading the posts in his group. Most of the people were outraged after the first video, yet most of them never even watched it. They went solely off of what Matthew Johnson said and /or they listened to what that twatwaffle Kevin Beegle had to say. I don't recall that slimeball being part of the narrative before last week.

Patrick Epistemon got the heave-ho from the Kool-Aid Klub for whatever reason. Before his seat got cold, there was Kevin Beegle throwing around assumptions like it was candy. All he has done is further obfuscate the issue. This is what happens when a Gladys Kravitz gets involved.

Anyway. The only thing different between the first and second video is that the second video contained softer language in the way of Bob really not wanting to make enemies. He wasn't bad mouthing Matt Johnson in the first video, which was obvious but the big dummy took offense where there should have been none.

In the first video Bob Gimlin said he did NOT write the foreword for the Johnson's book BUT he did okay the final draft for print. Bob also said he had not read Johnson's book. If he had, perhaps things would have turned out differently. Mr. Gimlin also said he does NOT believe in a paranormal/supernatural Bigfoot or portals, orbs or any of the "woo" stuff.
It's all there in the first video, so watch it if you want to make up your mind about this. Don't take my word for it.

Along comes the second video to reiterate what was said in the first video and included was some pleasantries about not saying anything negative about the crazy man Johnson (my words, not Bob's).

Then for some absolute dumbass reason, the kult klowns start rejoicing.

 First of all, Matthew Johnson has a severe comprehension problem. Bob never said that Johnson changed any of his words. He said he NEVER wrote the foreword. Kevin Jones wrote it for him and he agreed on the final draft BEFORE he read Matt's book. While the second video may come across as a "walking back" or a retraction, it was nothing of the sort. This is classic Matthew Johnson changing what was actually said and interjecting his own words. Understand?

To further confuse the issue, there is Kevin the parrot on Matt's shoulder spin-doctoring things that were not said by Bob.

Once again, Docor Demento can't seem to grasp what was ACTUALLY said by Bob Gimlin. Bob said he approved what Kevin Jones wrote and that it was before he read Matt's book. Why is Johnson trying to confuse the issue in his group?

I have no clue what Kevin is talking about. If Bob wrote something for Ron Morehead's book, did Bob write it or did Kevin Jones? Who the fuck is Mart and what the fuck does any of it have to do with a foreword that Kevin Jones wrote for Bob Gimlin?

I am happy that Matt Johnson found such an incompetent mangler such as Kevin Beegle. It doesn't help Johnson's cause at all. At least Patrick could spell, formulate sentences and make sense, for the most part. Johnson definitely traded down.

This Scott fellow seems to be keeping up, why can't Matt? In the first video, Bob clearly said he he does not believe in any of the woo stuff. Why would he? He was there when Roger Patterson filmed "Patty" in 1967.

There was no pressure from any of the "old schoolers". Johnson uses that term in a derogatory fashion so his followers will fall back in line. Make no mistake, Matthew Johnson is a controlling, lying abuser. He will say anything in order to protect his narrative. He fucked up a few times in his four part conference videos but that will be for other blog posts.

I have been hearing stories that Johnson changed the wording of other contributions in his fantasy book of fictional tales. If any of the Johnson contributors want to be brave enough to step forward and tell their story, please contact me. You must be willing to use your real name. Anonymous sources simply won't cut it.

I am of the thinking that many of Johnson's followers suffer from Stockholm Syndrome or something very similar. It is may seem impossible to break free but it is really very easy. Just remember, Matthew Johnson has no control over you and he can not harm you. It is time for Johnson to be exposed for the disgusting dirtbag he is. Contact me.

 Please watch both videos, compare what was said, then come to YOUR own conclusion. Don't let others tell you what to believe.

Matthew A. Johnson ~ The Beginning of the End?

It's no secret that I am not a fan of Matthew Johnson. I always thought he was a pompous ass and a liar. He is other things as well but mostly he is those two things.

Over the years his stories have become more grandiose. Bigger claims were made yet very little in the way of any sort of evidence has ever been presented. A three foot shiny shit in a box is not evidence of Bigfoot. Did he have any of the scat tested? If so, where is the data? Props are not evidence, folks. Seriously.

A few...or a couple of years ago (I didn't really pay attention) Matt Johnson started his own conference so he could beat his chest and tell people what to think. I had only ever seen snippets of his yawn inspiring bullshit but this year I decided to watch all four parts of his "Great Reveal".
To say I was appalled would be a gross understatement.

Throughout the entire four hour presentation, Johnson was angry, or appeared to be angry. He seemed agitated. I got the impression that he does not like to be questioned about his claims. It's as if he just expects people to blindly believe him, which a lot of people did, much to my surprise.
Johnson's rabid story was full of "I don't lie". Someone who does that much damage control is usually lying. Anyway, this blog post is not about the great reveal. If people can't shake the bullshit coma that this is, there is no hope for them.

This post is about this fictional book by Matthew A. Johnson. I call it a work of fiction for reasons that should become apparent later on.

Before, during and after his conference, Johnson hyped up his book and it centered around the foreword by none other than Mr. Bob Gimlin. Mr. Gimlin was supposed to be at the conference, according to Johnson but Gimlin allegedly had another engagement. How true this was, I have no idea. 

Fast forward until just a couple of days ago. Russell Acord had a sit down with Bob Gimlin so Bob could clear the air and state what really went on. Bob came across as very diplomatic, gracious and kind and it was a bit frustrating for me. I tend to be blunt about things so there is no guess work but we are all different.

I won't put any words in to Bob's mouth. If you have not watched the interview, here it is. Decide for yourself. Personally, I think a nice man was taken advantage of by a controlling assclown.

It didn't take long for a Johnson lap dog to come running out of the yard to impugn Russell Acord. Instead of letting the blame fall where it should, Patrick Epistemon tries to blame Russell, and to some degree, Bob Gimlin. Really? Bob Gimlin did not look like he was being forced to testify. I did not see Russell coerce Bob in to making statements. He simply asked questions and he let Bob speak. It's how interviews are done.

Patrick took it upon himself to be damage control.

There is just one problem with this. Patrick is trying to twist this in to basically calling Bob Gimlin a liar. Bob, in his own words said he should have been more careful. I got the impression that Bob felt he was lied to or otherwise misinformed as to what the book would be about.
By all accounts, Bob Gimlin is considered by most to be as honest as the day is long and I have no reason to disbelieve that. Mr. Gimlin appeared to be matter of fact and his body language doesn't lead me to believe he was lying.

Aside from Bob Gimlin, we have Adam Davies. I have tremendous respect for Adam Davies. After his radio interview in which he explained his experiences in SOHA, Adam was kind enough to call me at my request to discuss what went on up there.

Adam has denounced Matthew Johnson for his own reasons. It mainly has to do with Johnson's claims that Bigfoot can heal sick people. Matthew Johnson is an outright liar for saying such things and I will continue to believe and say that until absolute proof is brought forth to back up those outrageous claims. It is beyond reprehensible for a "doctor" to suggest such things.

Even Derek Randles had his say in the matter. Derek usually keeps to himself so for him to say anything, one should pay attention.

Are you seeing a common denominator yet?

There are other people who have turned on Johnson as well but I think it has more to do with the attention shifting than it has to do with anything noble. Self centered fuckers. They know who they are.

This next one is different. For the record I do not subscribe to her notions or claims. At one time we were Facebook friends but that came to an end after a blog post I wrote about ....Matthew Johnson.
Here we are, full circle now. 
During the time we were friends, her posts and comments were always consistent. Her opinions and experiences never deviated and she struck me as someone who honestly believes what she is saying.
This is vastly different than intentionally trying to mislead people.

As you can imagine, I was taken aback after reading her statement today. It is lengthy but I encourage everyone to read it in its entirety. Read it carefully.

 Basically, Matt took her words and embellished them to dress up her contribution to his book. Matthew Johnson's controlling nature rears its ugly head. The douchebag just can't be happy with a contribution from someone, he has to mess with it to satisfy his twisted ego.

I have no doubt that Matthew did the same thing with Bob Gimlin's alleged contribution. I wonder how many words were actually from Bob Gimlin, if any at all.

Will the Johnson apologists come out from the shadows to smear Alyssa's name or will they finally admit that they wrongfully believed Matthew A. Johnson?
I have no doubt that Ms. Runwithwolves' statement is the truth.

What I see is Matthew Johnson taking advantage of the kindness of people for his own selfish needs so he can peddle a book full of lies in a half empty room.

Epic. Tragic. Failure.

Don't be a rube.

 

Flawed Todd

Well, it looks like Todd Standing is back and he is grumpier than ever. It seemed like it was not long ago Todd said he was closing down his Facebook account and moving on.

Now he is back and he is defending his photos of the lifeless looking Bigfoot affectionately known as Blinky.
 It appears that Mr. Standing is miffed that I, and others compared his face to Blinky's. The facial features really are amazing and match up almost perfectly.

If you have not watched Todd's latest video, here it is. In this video Todd tries desperately to shoot down the idea that Todd is Blinky. In my opinion, he is trying to hard too defend himself.

In the video, Todd uses a Douglas Fir pine needle...yes, you read that correctly, a Douglas Fir pine needle. Those are Todd's words, not mine. Mind you, he said black bears don't give off a heat signature, so take it for what it is.
  Todd uses the fir needles as a ruler to measure the width of Blinky's face. As usual, Mr. Muppet talks fast enough and with enough confidence that on the surface, his analyses seems legit.

Instead of using math, Todd goes out on a limb and just guesses....but he makes it sound convincing. Conveniently, Standing tells us that he busted the lens used to take photos of Blinky. He also says it's a long story but fails to tell us the story. The guy is right there talking and making a video. It's a perfect time to tell us a long story. Maybe he hasn't thought it up yet or maybe stories are too easy to question.

Like Euell Gibbons in a Grape Nuts commercial, Todd gets down to business with his fir....I mean pine needles. He has made little coloured lines to show how wide Blinky's face is. What I want to know is, are those marks accurate and to scale with the face? If you notice, Blinky has a bit of a profile. The image is not a straight on shot, so that's strike one.

Standing has no idea how far the fir needle in reference is from the face of the subject. It's another guess made based on the arbitrary decision of a nameless "photographer". Todd therefore uses the well thought out equation of reducing the fir needle length by 10%. Strike two.

Mr. Smarty pants also has no idea how far the camera person was from the subject, nor does he mention if the photographer is on lower ground, higher ground or even ground with that of the subject. He makes no mention of the make and model of the camera or the lens.Strike three. Strike our. Strike five.

Todd leaves out absolutely everything that can lend credibility to his assertions on how big his bigfoot might be. He merely gives us his subjective opinions and states them as fact. Why should anyone take his word for that?

Todd Standing is going to have to do much better if he plans on hanging around for any length of time. Time for him to put on his big boy pants.

Kelly Shaw is a Crybaby

Remember on my last blog when I said that Kelly was a detriment to himself? Well, he's gone and stuck his big foot in his big fat crybaby mouth again. The fucking baby just can't man up and admit when he was wrong. He has to blame someone else.

Jelly Jaw was hoaxed by some fun loving folks hoaxing a video. Normally hoaxes bother me but this particular one was so obviously not a bigfoot because it was just a dark blip on the screen.

I have linked to the video because I want this guy to make some money because of the grief Kelly Shaw is causing him. Be kind and click the video.

Shaw is crying because he spent money to go to the location and check it out. He wanted to be the bigshot, first on the scene, so that's his problem. Nobody told him to pack up and go there. I never heard Jack and Jeff cry when they were hoaxed by those two kids. I never heard them cry when it came to being duped...many times.

Poor old jabber jaw has his panties in a bunch now because he made an ass of himself and we are all laughing at him. He's blaming the people that made the bigfoot video and Shaw wants his pound of flesh.

Kelly Shaw is whining like a bitch and he claims to have filed a complaint with the FAA against the guy with the Bigfoot video. The FAA assured Kelly? Really now? Shaw is known to lie a lot when things don't go his way. He's a bully and a thin skinned fucking pansy. If I bitched like he did my old man, RIP,  would have slapped me silly.

Shaw is a hypocrite, and a bitch. Don't forget bitch. I wonder if Mr. Bitch has his commercial pilot license for drones. If he does, he should produce it. How come Kelly can make monetized videos using his drone and hardpack101 can not? There is no law against using a drone to make a hoax video.

I visited the halfwit's channel and found a few interesting videos.

Look at that. Monetized drone videos. Fucking hypocrite. Crybaby bitch. Kelly Shaw needs to suck it up and put on his big boy pants. He should take it on the chin, man up, and just admit he was duped. It would likely have been less painful in the long run.


The problem with Shaw's alleged complaint is...well...it seems to be full of shit. A big huge pile of shit. Either Shaw is lying, which has been proven several times in the past, or the person he spoke to at the FAA is just as incompetent as Shaw.

My friend S,teve Alcorn, posted this in the Coalition group on Facebook, so I thank him for this information.

Model Aircrraft Operations   <<<Link

Judging from hardpack101's video, he seems to be within the guidelines mentioned above.

Once again, it looks like hardpack101 is within the law. His video was made for shits and giggles. So what if it's monetized? (Click his video). His video is for recreation. It's not like he was hired to take aerial shots of the Empire State Building for Architect Digest  or some other magazine. THAT would be for commercial use. Nobody hired hardpack101 to make a hoax video.

Kelly Shaw just needs to shut his big lying yap. His big mouth gets his dumb ass in to trouble every time. He's a baby and a bully. Nothing more. Oh. He's a lying hypocrite as well.

If I got a dollar for every time I was threatened with the law, I could buy a fancy Starbuck's coffee. Not that I'd want to buy their overpriced shitty coffee though. I'll take Tim's any day. Double double.

Special Ed and his Harem of Delusionals

The world of Bigfoot is getting crazier everyday. Asinine would be closer to the mark actually.

Recently Matt Johnson declared that a portal opened up at his uber secret location somewhere between fat bastard raccoons and diabetic squirrels, or more commonly known as SOHA.
 Not a shred of evidence has been shown by Johnson to indicate that any of his claims are true. Talks of cloaking, mindspeak and disabling a portal with a mere flashlight is best left for late night stories to tell the kidlets around a campfire. It's not the stuff for serious adults interested in the subject of Bigfoot.
Show me some compelling evidence and I may change my mind.

This brings me to Ed Waterman. Ed's stories, photos and theories are more outlandish than Matt Johnson's or any other woo peddler out there in Bigfootland. Anyone declaring that Bigfoot has supernatural powers is full of shit, in my opinion. Big steaming piles of grade a horse shit.

These people have it made and there is no shortage of former turnip truck riders willing to believe these con artists. The crazier the story, the more people will believe it. Why? The rationale goes "who would make that up?" A fucking liar, that's who.

Next to Matt Johnson, Ed Waterman is a huge pet peeve of mine. He claims to be a great photographer but many of his photos are mediocre at best. I've seen better. Hell, I've taken better.

Let's get to the meat and potatoes of this blog post. Recently a photo surfaced showing a clear side shot of what appears to be a Bigfoot. Many opinions were passed around and until very recently, I wasn't sure if a unanimous decision had been reached. I shrugged off the photo until this evening when certain things were brought to my attention by a friend.

Here is the photo in question.

I was quite sure that this photo made the rounds a year or so ago. Photos and videos usually cycle through the community as new people arrive and it's to be expected.

I could forgive a new person for not knowing where this photo came from but I don't think I would be inclined to excuse Special Ed. You may ask yourself why I'm hard on Ed. My answer would be "because he is full of shit". Ed makes it up as he goes along. He just wings it and the gullible rubes gobble it up like candy.

When presented with the photo, here is what Waterman had to say.

Obviously Ed Waterman has no clue about the photo, who took it, or where it came from. I think Ed saw an opportunity to prop himself up with more steaming piles of shit, and he sure doesn't disappoint.

If he knew nothing about the photo, why make up all these things? Why invoke all this woo bullshit without so much as a shred of evidence to back up the claim?

He could have said he knew nothing about the photo but he didn't do that. It is for that very reason that I feel comfortable saying Ed Waterman is a hoaxing, lying assclown. He fabricated every word of his long winded story.


Unlike Ed, we had our suspicions of who owned the photo. It was just a matter of finding the "Bigfoot" in the exact pose. After a short search, Bruce Kelley was able to find the video in which the screenshot was taken from.

Well, would you look at that. A Mark Anders fake ass Bigfoot. Most of us already knew this but now we have the proof.

Here is the video.

Be careful who you believe and what you believe. There are too many charlatans in the land of Bigfoot and they will make your money disappear faster than you can say "What the fuck?"

More Hijinx From Squatchmaster

Jeff Patterson is at it again. The Squatchmaster claims to have recorded yet another Bigfoot. I wonder how many he has recorded now, I've lost count.

This particular video is especially bad because he uploaded the video at low resolution (480), probably to hide anything that could be found. Many of his other videos have been uploaded at 1080, so I'm wondering why.

I never realized how bad Jeff's acting is until today. I have only needed to watch three or four of Jeff's videos to figure out how he works. I won't give anything away because he will just change his strategy. I will say this though, he works in a very similar style to Timbergiant Bigfoot.

Squatchmaster immediately tells a few lies or he doesn't understand what he wrote.

The video wasn't "live" to begin with. Jeff says the video is "uncut". Excuse me, I counted at least eight (8) cuts. Since the video had cuts in it, the video is not "unedited". Hoaxmaster also took almost a week to post this video. I have noticed that with a lot of videos, the "evidence" is always found weeks or months later and is then shared.

Here is his latest video, although, I thought he had posted this one earlier. Maybe I have it mixed up with another log throwing video.
 

I kept wondering why Squatchmaster would make eight cuts in an eight minute and change video. I noticed he made about three cuts very close together and it was all in the almost exact location he was standing. I thought there had to be a reason, so I watched the video about another five times and caught what I needed to see after the third time. I wanted to be sure it wasn't the flower tops or grass dancing in the breeze.

Watch the clip below. The first part will be at regular speed, then I'll slow it down a bit.

After I noticed the black, and obviously living creature (guy in a costume), it became clear as to why Jeff made three cuts. My guess is he was giving instructions to his son, or some other person. You can also hear the black thing move from left to right. I thought Bigfoot were supposed to be stealthy beings. This one makes as much noise as Squatchmaster.

There is little chance that Jeff would not see and hear this thing in person.

We have a red flag in his description.

The Squatchmaster states they discovered a sleeping Bigfoot 20 feet away. There was no sleeping Bigfoot because the person in the costume was seen TWICE during recording. This video is just plain terrible in my opinion.

Another huge red flag is the cut while he is recording the alleged beast. The next sequence shows Jeff on the scene of trampled grass and he is acting like something amazing has happened.

 If I had a Bigfoot in frame, I would not stop recording until the thing left, chased me or my battery died. There was absolutely NO excuse to stop recording...unless he needed to cut for a reason, such as his son (or other person) exposed himself.


This may not be proof of a hoax but I think it's fairly good evidence. We have already proven that Squatchmaster has hoaxed twice in the past.

The Squatchmaster is Busted

I have long suspected Jeff Patterson, AKA, The Squatchmaster of hoaxing his alleged evidence but hard proof was hard to come by.

 Those of you who are familiar with Jeff may have seen his infamous "tree shaker" video that was featured on 'Finding Bigfoot'. That video did not fair well on the program and Jeff was extremely bitter over the situation.

  Jeff also had a video where he tried to pass off photos of a Gorilla as a Bigfoot. As usual, when jeff gets caught in something, he is quick to remove the videos.

It's not going to happen this time. Before I get to the video, here are a couple of reminders that Squatchmaster doesn't think Bigfoot exists.

If you have not seen Jeff's video of "Sasquatch Speech". Listen to this, it's worse than Sasquatch Ontario's audio.

Just in case Squatchmaster decides to delete his videos, I took the liberty of grabbing a couple of screen shots.

Here is a couple of more screen shots, just in case Jeff tries to back pedal. At least a few people are calling him out on his bullshit lies.

I would like to give credit where credit is due. Sam Kitchen suggests the audio is of human speech played backwards. I decided to put his assertions to the test.

Well, did you hear that, folks? Clear spoken English! I have no idea where Jeff originally got the audio but it's not really important. The important thing is that the Squatchmaster intentionally altered an audio recording and passed it off as Bigfoot language.

The man is a fraud. It has now been proven that Jeff Patterson is a hoaxer. There is no doubt. No wiggle room this time Jeff. It's time for you to have a garage sale and sell your equipment. Find a new hobby.

Patterson also has one or two paranormal YouTube channels, so we might as well dismiss all of those videos too.