Raise your hand if you are sick and tired of listening to the liar, Matthew Johnson babble on endlessly about his made up Bigfoots and portals. I have done my best to ignore the blatant liar and condescending douchebag but his laughable stories of fantasy keeps popping up in some Facebook groups.
Seriously, there are people who eat up the campfire stories told by Johnson. Really. I need to sell those people a few bridges and some prime swamp land. Only an absolute imbecile could believe such tales of pure shit. Johnson doesn't even try any more. He just says whatever comes to his tiny little brain and regurgitates through his enormous piehole. And then his mindless minions clap and high-five each other. That is sad and pathetic but I don't try to convince them otherwise. What is the point?
I strongly believe that Matthew A. Johnson made up the entire portal story. To this day, he has not produced one piece of evidence to support his outrageous and delusional claims. Not a single one. A homemade machine is not evidence, especially when the maker of the machine was not present when Johnson claims to have done his *barf* savior work *barf*. There are no photos, no videos. Nothing.
Bullshit testimonials don't count. People lie. Some people have mental problems. There are many reasons why witness testimony is not acceptable.
So, here is a legitimate and honest challenge. I am willing to put my money where my mouth is. I will give Matthew Johnson FIVE THOUSAND ($5,000) dollars if he can prove what he claims with regards to his functional portal device and the opening of a portal. I don't care to see any Bigfoot, so there should be no excuses for Matt to say why he can't accept the challenge.
He just has to PROVE that his device works and he has to PROVE that he can open and close a portal using his device. The proof must me irrefutable and verified by any three upstanding university professors or scientists. There must be real facts, not subjective opinions or testimonials. Real facts from real scientists. This should be a piece of cake for the big oaf.
I am not asking for the impossible and I don't want anything if he loses the challenge. Put up or shut up, it is that simple. An easy task for Mr. Big Mouth, right? An easy $5,000 in his pocket.
If Matthew Johnson refuses the challenge, then it is safe to assume that he is a liar. A fraud. A flim-flam man. An all around arrogant predator who uses his position as a "doctor" to prey on the weak -minded. He even uses his own child to promote his bullshit. That is a twisted kind of creepy.
It's no secret that I am not a fan of Matthew Johnson. I always thought he was a pompous ass and a liar. He is other things as well but mostly he is those two things.
Over the years his stories have become more grandiose. Bigger claims were made yet very little in the way of any sort of evidence has ever been presented. A three foot shiny shit in a box is not evidence of Bigfoot. Did he have any of the scat tested? If so, where is the data? Props are not evidence, folks. Seriously.
A few...or a couple of years ago (I didn't really pay attention) Matt Johnson started his own conference so he could beat his chest and tell people what to think. I had only ever seen snippets of his yawn inspiring bullshit but this year I decided to watch all four parts of his "Great Reveal". To say I was appalled would be a gross understatement.
Throughout the entire four hour presentation, Johnson was angry, or appeared to be angry. He seemed agitated. I got the impression that he does not like to be questioned about his claims. It's as if he just expects people to blindly believe him, which a lot of people did, much to my surprise. Johnson's rabid story was full of "I don't lie". Someone who does that much damage control is usually lying. Anyway, this blog post is not about the great reveal. If people can't shake the bullshit coma that this is, there is no hope for them.
This post is about this fictional book by Matthew A. Johnson. I call it a work of fiction for reasons that should become apparent later on.
Before, during and after his conference, Johnson hyped up his book and it centered around the foreword by none other than Mr. Bob Gimlin. Mr. Gimlin was supposed to be at the conference, according to Johnson but Gimlin allegedly had another engagement. How true this was, I have no idea.
Fast forward until just a couple of days ago. Russell Acord had a sit down with Bob Gimlin so Bob could clear the air and state what really went on. Bob came across as very diplomatic, gracious and kind and it was a bit frustrating for me. I tend to be blunt about things so there is no guess work but we are all different.
I won't put any words in to Bob's mouth. If you have not watched the interview, here it is. Decide for yourself. Personally, I think a nice man was taken advantage of by a controlling assclown.
It didn't take long for a Johnson lap dog to come running out of the yard to impugn Russell Acord. Instead of letting the blame fall where it should, Patrick Epistemon tries to blame Russell, and to some degree, Bob Gimlin. Really? Bob Gimlin did not look like he was being forced to testify. I did not see Russell coerce Bob in to making statements. He simply asked questions and he let Bob speak. It's how interviews are done.
Patrick took it upon himself to be damage control.
There is just one problem with this. Patrick is trying to twist this in to basically calling Bob Gimlin a liar. Bob, in his own words said he should have been more careful. I got the impression that Bob felt he was lied to or otherwise misinformed as to what the book would be about. By all accounts, Bob Gimlin is considered by most to be as honest as the day is long and I have no reason to disbelieve that. Mr. Gimlin appeared to be matter of fact and his body language doesn't lead me to believe he was lying.
Aside from Bob Gimlin, we have Adam Davies. I have tremendous respect for Adam Davies. After his radio interview in which he explained his experiences in SOHA, Adam was kind enough to call me at my request to discuss what went on up there.
Adam has denounced Matthew Johnson for his own reasons. It mainly has to do with Johnson's claims that Bigfoot can heal sick people. Matthew Johnson is an outright liar for saying such things and I will continue to believe and say that until absolute proof is brought forth to back up those outrageous claims. It is beyond reprehensible for a "doctor" to suggest such things.
Even Derek Randles had his say in the matter. Derek usually keeps to himself so for him to say anything, one should pay attention.
Are you seeing a common denominator yet?
There are other people who have turned on Johnson as well but I think it has more to do with the attention shifting than it has to do with anything noble. Self centered fuckers. They know who they are.
This next one is different. For the record I do not subscribe to her notions or claims. At one time we were Facebook friends but that came to an end after a blog post I wrote about ....Matthew Johnson. Here we are, full circle now. During the time we were friends, her posts and comments were always consistent. Her opinions and experiences never deviated and she struck me as someone who honestly believes what she is saying. This is vastly different than intentionally trying to mislead people.
As you can imagine, I was taken aback after reading her statement today. It is lengthy but I encourage everyone to read it in its entirety. Read it carefully.
Basically, Matt took her words and embellished them to dress up her contribution to his book. Matthew Johnson's controlling nature rears its ugly head. The douchebag just can't be happy with a contribution from someone, he has to mess with it to satisfy his twisted ego. I have no doubt that Matthew did the same thing with Bob Gimlin's alleged contribution. I wonder how many words were actually from Bob Gimlin, if any at all. Will the Johnson apologists come out from the shadows to smear Alyssa's name or will they finally admit that they wrongfully believed Matthew A. Johnson? I have no doubt that Ms. Runwithwolves' statement is the truth.
What I see is Matthew Johnson taking advantage of the kindness of people for his own selfish needs so he can peddle a book full of lies in a half empty room.
Once again the boys from the Bluff Creek Project give us something substantial before 2015 comes to a close. Jamie and Steven have been hot on the trail of the location of Matt Johnson's SOHA location since at least this past summer.
Johnson repeatedly mocked and taunted the duo, telling them that they would never set foot at SOHA (or something like that). It looks like Steven and Jamie have the last laugh.
I won't do too much talking because the photos and videos speak for themselves. The only reason I am posting this is because I heard that the team at Johnson's Facebook group have been busy deleting all references to the site being found. Tsk, tsk. What a totalitarian approach they have.
According to Steven and Jamie, there are houses within a mile of this deep-in-the-woods location and dogs could be heard barking from the site.
EDIT: " FINDING SOFA group here, especially Mitchell Wilson,
who was the one who finally located the site on Google Earth. There are
a number of others. I'm just waiting on for permission to name them.
With us at first were Chris Burbick and "Anonymous," then expanding to include Phil Poling, Mitchell, Richard Allen (Special Cuntsultant), and Kirk Brandenburg. Many anonymous sources helped our group along, some of them inadvertently as they are TS-USA minions. Rictor Riolo and ScoutLee Finch
helped, and hooked us up with some other sources. It was a very WIDE
NET we used to catch this bird with all the clues good and bad."
I really didn't think I would be blogging about this portal thing, but here I am, blogging about it. All things related to Matt Johnson is Richard Allen's realm, so I hope he doesn't mind if I jump in with my two coppers worth of opinions.
As almost everyone in Bigfootland is aware, Adam Davies and John Carlson recently gave an exclusive interview so they could explain what they claim to have witnessed. I thought the interview was well done and I thought it was thorough. I didn't have any lingering questions in my mind afterwards.
I don't know John Carlson or Adam Davies but both men came across as being sincere. That's my impression anyway. I will accept it at face value until it's proven otherwise.
There are some people who are under the impression that I hate Matthew Johnson and that is untrue. I dislike the man because I think he is an arrogant asshole who feels that he has to talk down to people. One just needs to visit his Facebook page or watch his videos in order for this to be evident. The man punts more people from his page than anyone else, or so it seems. I dislike Matt Johnson but I don't hate him. I think he's full of shit as well. Why is that you may ask? Let me do my best to explain.
It seems quite apparent that all three men experienced "something" but what exactly, still has to be determined. Matt Johnson calls it a portal and he says that he has definitive proof of this portal. So far no tangible evidence has been shown to anyone to support this extraordinary claim.
Then on the other hand we have Davies and Carlson. Neither man wants to call this a portal and both men agree that their story is by no means proof of anything but they do maintain that "something" happened to them that night in June of 12014.
Originally, I was going to talk about the interview and the portal itself but things took a sharp turn. What I will talk about are the discrepancies in the narrative with regards to the telling of events of those two nights in June.
Within moments of the interview, I realized that there was a bit of a quandary. All three men claim to have seen the same thing but one of those men, Matthew Johnson, describes things completely differently than what Davies and Carlson describe. WHY is that?
It is well documented, and it is admitted by Matthew Johnson that he went to sleep shortly after witnessing the "portal". It is also documented that Johnson didn't think it was a big deal because he thought the "portal" was Bigfoot related, and if I'm not mistaken, Matt still believes that. You'd think it would be drilled in to my head by now because he drones on about the same things over and over and over in every fucking video. It's like he's trying to hypnotize you in to believing his words are the facts. Matthew is allegedly a psychologist, so I wouldn't put it past him. I'm sure he has many manipulative techniques at his disposal for the sake of patient compliance.
One thing I found really strange was the fact that Johnson felt he needed to record a preemptive video and post it before Adam and John's interview. In the video, Matt repeats himself numerous times at his frustration over Adam not coming forward. Johnson is his usual condescending, arrogant self. Anyway, I thought it was strange. It's as if Johnson was worried that these men might say something that Matt wouldn't have an answer for. He seemed worried and nervous to me. He can't hide it behind his fake smiles and laughter. This is NOT my first rodeo when it comes to calling out bullshitters.
I'm getting a bit long winded here, so I'll give you a video to watch.
In the above video you will have noticed that Matt's descriptions are hugely different than those of Davies and Carlson. Why is that? Matthew Johnson was the least impressed with this "portal" but he ends up talking about it the most. Adam said he had hoped to not discuss this for years, possibly never but we have Johnson bragging like he's some sort of hero who strolled in to save the day.
It is evident that Matt lied about quite a few things so he could play the big shot at his first ever woo conference. According to Adam and Carlson, the "portal" looked nothing like a Stargate. Adam says the being was possibly smooth but Johnson calls them hairy Ewoks. Adam turned the light on the "portal", not Johnson.
If Johnson lied about this, what else has he lied about? I can't put my finger on it yet but something is fishy. Very fishy.
To make matters worse, Johnson creates a two part follow up video to the interview so he can hammer more thoughts in the heads of his fans. It took him and Cynthia....well, mostly Matt, over an hour to say five minutes worth of words. The videos are terrible. Even if you don't like me, you can't deny that Matt repeats the same selling points over and over and over again. He says he agrees with the interview but he acts like he is trying to nullify it. He has that same nervous vibe about him during both videos.
Matt tries to hammer home that he has "facts". Lots and lots of "facts". The fact is that he has nothing. Nothing at all. He claims to have replicated the opening of the "portal" a few times but he has no tangible proof or evidence. Where are the multiple videos? All the man has are excuses as to why he can't produce anything. I think his monthly treks to the land of make believe are taking a toll on Johnson. The need to produce "something" for his fans must put him under a lot of pressure. We see this time and time again with the YouTube researchers. It would get kind of boring if he had months of nothing to talk about. God forbid he try to educate anyone about his area such as the fauna and foliage.
Where was I? Oh, yes. The two part follow up ass kissing videos. I really had a good laugh during my bouts of comatose drooling. Johnson brings up the Oregon Vortex of all things to even mention. He speaks of it as if it lends credibility to his novel of bullshit.
Johnson somehow thinks that because he, Adam and John went to the Oregon Vortex (scam), that they managed (lol) to pick up ju-ju and fairy dust, lmao. I never use "lol" in my blogging but damn, I can barely contain myself because of the overt stupidity on Johnson's part. Is he serious? The Oregon Vortex? The place is nothing but a money making amusement. It's a tongue in cheek curiosity for tourists, just the same as the Montana Vortex and other roadside attractions.
There is no science behind such 30's era amusements. These places have been proven to be bunk. Optical illusions, nothing more. Good grief already. The portal story is really stretching things as it is but to give it credence because they picked up pixie dust and thus Matt was able to reopen the portal? For real? Even a child would know he was being fucked with. The Oregon fucking Vortex???? That was the most idiotic thing to come out of Johnson's mouth in a week, I swear.
I know there those who think these places are magical and unique but they aren't. They are man made attractions that use deception in to tricking the mind in to believing certain things.
If you doubt me, here is just one article explaining what these backwoods scams are.
The fact that Matt is hanging his hat on this as a key to his portal shows me that he is desperate. Let's be completely honest with ourselves here. Pour a drink. Take a sip. Sit back and ponder that thought for a few minutes folks. Ju-Ju. Fairy dust. Yes, an adult said that in all seriousness. You better slam back that drink now.
For a guy who claims to be less interested in this portal, he sure is using it a lot in order to leverage him self some notoriety. Damn the portal, it's all about the forest friends. Fuck you! It's all about you and your hugely inflated ego and your self important attitude. Matt Johnson makes Rick Dyer look like a fucking saint. At least Dyer knew when to cash out and then admit to hoaxing.
What a piece of work Johnson is after all.
His blatant lying for the last fifteen months. At any time before now, Matt had ample time to change his mind or retell his story. He didn't do that. Not once.
What Matt has done is use the interview to shovel more bullshit on to his already horrendously bad story of how habituating is the best. I have news for you Johnson. Get someone to read this to you after you get your jammies on...the pink unicorn ones. How Scientists Habituate Chimps
Read this one too, it's more horrifying. This shows what influence mankind can have over a primate. While trying to do the right thing, we end up making things worse. Demonic Ape
I have always maintained that habituating (provisioning) is wrong, especially when it is done in an uncontrolled environment. No amount of jumping up and down will eliminate the fact thatany woodland creature can take food from gifting bowls.
Johnson also had the audacity to say that Bigfoot, if it exists, is NOT a primate. Is that a fact now? After what I have seen from Johnson, why the fuck would I even entertain that notion?
Just a couple of more things before I go. Many people asked Johnson for some proof that he opened up the portal. This is what we got.
Give that picture a good hard look. I never saw it until a couple of friends pointed it out to me.
Can you see it yet?
It looks like a pair of legs with crocs or similar shoes on the feet. That foot with the croc is Matthew Johnson's and it's from the same weekend as the "portal" photo.
Try to do better next time, okay??
As far as Adam Davies and John Carlson are concerned, I believe that they believe that they saw something. I do not know the history of either man, so I have to give them the benefit if the doubt.
During the interview, Adam Davies had ruled out hoaxing. I hope that he will reconsider that position given the circumstances.
I know Adam reads my blog, so I hope he reads this one as well.
If some people are so willing to quickly accept paranormal answers to their questions, why will they not entertain more mundane answers?
Think about it folks. Think about everything. Question everything. You owe yourself that much.
